A word about the reference notebook
As we mentioned previously, we are comparing the NEC Versa UltraLite against
a full-size notebook, the Acer Travelmate 739TLV. The Acer notebook sports
a Intel Pentium III-M 850MHz processor with SpeedStep that operates at 700MHz
when in mobile mode. More detailed information can be found about the 739TLV on
Acer's website . The NEC Versa UltraLite subnotebook on the other
hand, operates at 600MHz. The purpose of the comparison is not to create a head-to-head 600MHz
Crusoe to 600MHz Pentium shoot out. Transmeta's own benchmarking endeavors have shown
that when faced off against the same speed Intel processor, the benchmarks place
Crusoe in second place. Rather, emphasis should be placed on battery life, and
on the relative scoring of the 600MHz Crusoe processor in the series of
productivity benchmarks which are to follow. Since we are dealing with two
different speed
processors, you will expect the PIII to outperform the Crusoe in each
case.
Synthetic Battery Life Tests
To test the battery life of both notebooks as accurately as possible we
set up the following test parameters before running BatteryMark 4.0.1. Both
the Acer 739TLV and the NEC UltraLite had their batteries completely drained and then
fully charged overnight. To reduce the impact on the battery life by such variables
as the screen brightness, each LCD display was turned down to its'
lowest possible setting.
Thus, with a freshly
charged battery and screens set to the lowest possible brightness, the benchmark
was conducted twice.
The Acer notebook was configured so that Speed Step was running in "battery optimized mode", a setting that yield the best possible
comparison against the Crusoe-based NEC UltraLite insofar as power consumption
is concerned.
BatteryMark 4.0.1
measures battery life on notebook computers running Windows 95, Windows Me, Windows 98, Windows NT 4.0, or
Windows 2000. BatteryMark does this by running three different 32-bit software workload engines
and periodical rest times that drain a notebook's battery
in a way that mimics real use. The benchmark returns
its results in terms of the duration the notebook was able to remain
operable. Note that the test does not make use of either the FDD or CDROM.
Longer life times are best.
| BatteryMark 4.0.1 Benchmark Results |
| Notebook |
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
| NEC Versa UltraLite |
5:25 |
5:36 |
| ACER Travelmate 739TLV |
3:54 |
4:01 |
As
you can see by the preceding graph, the NEC Versa UltraLite was able to remain
in use for about 5 and a half hours. Comparatively, the Acer 739TLV remained
operable for only 4 hours. A difference of one and a half hours of use, or
28.3% between the NEC and Acer is quite significant and exhibits one of
the main benefits of the Crusoe processor - its' low power
consumption.
The NEC UltraLite uses two batteries, a built-in
1800mAH Lithium Polymer battery and a removable 2500mAH Lithium-Ion battery pack. The
Acer 739TLV uses a single removable 5400mAH Lithium-Ion battery
pack.